Attempting to Set the Doug Phillips Record Straight: Part 3 – The Timeline


This is an account of the Douglas Phillips’ sex abuse scandal as told by sources close to Phillips’ former business and ministry, Vision Forum, and church, Boerne Christian Assembly. It chronicles when people discovered the depth of his adulterous relationship and describes actions they took.


 Note: This article is Part 3 in a series:

  1. Attempting to Set the Doug Phillips Record Straight: Part 1 – The Puzzle of Control
  2. Attempting to Set the Doug Phillips Record Straight: Part 2 – The Victim


Introduction:  There will be a bit of overlap from the previous article in order to present a complete timeline.  This article has been compiled based on information I have gathered and a timeline of notes sent to me by a person who has had a birds-eye view of Doug Phillips and his ministry for many years. Before publishing, it was checked by other sources to ensure that the account is as accurate as possible. Doug Phillips’ victim will be referred to as “Victim” throughout the article, and the Sources will remain unnamed. ~ja


Doug Phillips, Vision Forum Screen Shot 2014-03-11 at 12.03.20 PM

Over the past several months there have been many articles published about the fall of Douglas W. Phillips. Much of what has been published by a certain blog covering these stories has been exaggerated and inaccurate, motivated by bitterness and hate against Doug Phillips and his teachings more than a pure desire for the truth.

Meanwhile, several sources within the community of Boerne Christian Assembly (BCA) near San Antonio, Texas, and Vision Forum have come forward with their personal accounts. These sources have direct contact with Victim. The desire of these sources and all the people involved in this unfortunate situation is to see that Doug Phillips is never again in a leadership or ministry position.

The Victim of Doug Phillips will remain unnamed in this article, as will the Sources.



Victim and her family were members of Boerne Christian Assembly (BCA) for many years.  She and her family helped out in the Phillips home over the years, but not on a consistent basis. She did work as nanny at times for the Phillips family and cared for children on trips, but this was not a full-time job.

Doug Phillips began grooming Victim after she was legally an adult. This led to an emotional affair, and later, a physical and sexual relationship. The guarding of this adultery is at the center of Doug Phillips’ eventual downfall.


2007 through 2010: “Grooming” Becomes Adultery

In 2007, this illicit relationship became sexual. To be clear, Doug Phillips was honest about one thing and that was that he “did not ‘know’ his victim in the biblical sense.” In 2007, the victim began spending more time in the Phillips home and with the Phillips family. She was considered a close family friend at that point. Also in 2007, Phillips employed Victim to write Jonathan Park radio drama scripts with his daughter in an effort to spend more time with her. This was a paid position and provided Doug more opportunities to spend more time with Victim in his home after his children had gone to bed.

In 2008, Doug Phillips was confronted by a member of BCA and friend of Victim, but there was no evidence to prove his guilt. Many people at this time began to notice the relationship with Doug and Victim, but no one had real and hard evidence of any wrong behavior other than it just did not look right.

In 2009, Victim’s mother caught Doug Phillips and Victim having sexual-based chat sessions in the middle of the night. Doug, his wife, Beall, and Victim’s parents met. This was the first time Doug and Beall and Victim’s parents met together. Doug confessed to having romantic feelings for Victim, but there was no acknowledgement of any sexual impropriety. At the time, Victim did not disclose any sexual impropriety, but only the romantic feelings they shared together.

In October 2010, Beall Phillips was made aware of the adulterous nature of the relationship when Victim’s mother informed her that Doug and Victim had been kissing. Also in 2010, Doug Phillips sent Victim’s parents on a vacation, perhaps as an attempt to “buy” them off.


2011 through 2012: First Private Confrontation; Double-Life Unravels

In the summer of 2011, while in Paris, Doug was confronted by Peter Bradrick (his Vision Forum Executive Assistant) regarding the inappropriate behavior Doug was exhibiting towards Victim in public. Doug denied that anything was going on. Many people were suspicious that there was something inappropriate going on between Doug and Victim, but no one had any proof yet.

Doug told Victim they were soul mates. He told her he loved her and had promised they’d eventually get married and have children together. During these years, the relationship with Victim ebbed and flowed. Doug worked very hard at keeping prospective courters away from his victim. Victim also affirmed her affections towards Phillips.

Despite what others have claimed, Doug and Victim were not seen holding hands at the 2012 San Antonio Independent Christian Film Festival (founded by Doug in 2004), and Doug did not give her an engagement ring (Victim’s friend gave her a costume jewelry ring).

In December 2012, Doug’s double life began to unravel when he was caught trying to climb in Victim’s bedroom window. Victim’s father and brother chased Doug down the street with a gun until Doug stepped under a street light, revealing his identity. The relationship with Victim ended on that day, and reports that they were still seeing each other throughout 2013 are completely fabricated.

Around this time, Victim finally divulged to her parents the extent of her relationship with Doug Phillips.

After Doug Phillips was caught trying to enter Victim’s bedroom window, there was another private meeting between Doug, Beall, and Victim’s parents. They agreed to keep things quiet. BCA elder Bob Sarratt was not notified.


January to August 2013: Cover-Up Efforts and Changes

In January 2013, Doug Phillips told Bob Sarratt that he was resigning from BCA leadership in order to spend more time with his family. This is the same reason Doug told the congregation of BCA for his stepping down. The Phillips family even sent an email to several friends and ministry leaders around the country, asking them to listen to the sermon Doug preached regarding his resignation. So, not only did Doug deceive his congregation and its elders, he misled and deceived others by leading them to believe this resignation was purely to focus on his family.

The week after Doug resigned, Victim and her family sat down with Bob Sarratt and told him the truth. Bob was understandably devastated and completely unsure of how to handle the situation. At that time, Victim’s family stopped attending BCA permanently and started attending a church in Fredericksburg, Texas.

Bob Sarratt, Doug and Beall Phillips, Victim, and her family all agreed to keep the sins of Doug Phillips confidential and tell no one. The elders at the Fredericksburg church became aware of the situation at the time but also had no idea what to do about it.

On February 28, Scott Brown, long-time Vision Forum friend, posted an article, “What does True Repentance Look Like?

In March, Jeff Horn becomes “provisional elder” at Boerne Christian Assembly.

Between February and August of 2013, life went on for Doug Phillips apparently as planned — until Victim started talking to people in August of 2013 and telling her story.


August-October 2013: Cover-Up Collapses; Phillips Resigns

On August 7, 2013, Doug posted an article entitled, “True Repentance – A Key to Family Blessing.

Late August 2013, Jeff Horn at BCA found out about Doug Phillips’ sexual scandal.

On September 5-7, Doug spoke at a conference put on by FORGE Ministries, “Engage the Battle” and “Master’s Plan for Fatherhood.”

On September 9, Doug did some damage control. He met with the board of Vision Forum Ministries and confessed to them, saying he had only kissed Victim a few times and did not have intercourse with her.

In September and October, Doug was quietly planning his resignation, on his terms. He was going to step down from leadership and cancel all speaking engagements. Please be clear Doug Phillips was not doing this because he was repentant. He was doing it because he now had to.

In October, several people from the San Antonio community who had knowledge of the situation contacted one of the five men who eventually confronted Doug at his home on October 29. They alerted him to what Victim had told them. This man called the Victim to confirm what he had been told. He then called several other men to break the news to them and they went into action. This included contacting Pastor Joe Morecraft. Reports that Pastor Morecraft found out about Doug Phillips’ sins while on a trip to Greece in September 20-29, 2013, are completely false; he never found out until he was called and told about it in October 2013.

On October 29,  five men went to Doug Phillips’ home to confront him. These were: former Vision Forum associates/staffers Peter Bradrick and Jordan Muela, former Vision Forum assistant Bob Renaud, friend and pastor Joe Morecraft, and Doug’s old college friend Mark Weaver. These men took time off from their jobs, spent their own money for air fare, and flew in from various parts of the country in order to confront Doug.

Beall was present at this confrontation. Doug and Beall were furious that these long-time friends came to confront Doug. Instead of receiving the counsel of his friends, Doug spent time in the meeting trying to claim he did not commit adultery and that he was working through the situation with his local church and Vision Forum Ministries board. His longtime friends just wanted him to make a full confession and own his own sin, along the exact lines of his own email which he sent out back in August 7 entitled, “True Repentance.” Doug refused the counsel of his friends.  

On October 30, Bob Sarratt called an emergency meeting with the men of BCA so Doug could confess his sins. That same day, the Statement of Resignation by Doug Phillips was released on Vision Forum Ministries’ website.


November 2013: Responses and Damage Control Attempts

The public posting of Doug Phillips’ resignation from Vision Forum Ministries on October 30th triggered actions on multiple fronts from organizations, prominent public figures, and private individuals. Many of these were paralleled by apparent attempts at damage control by Doug Phillips. There was also intense online scrutiny of and blogging about many of the people and organizations involved — or that were speculated to have been involved.


Early Responses by Confronters, Victim, Vision Forum Ministries Board, and BCA

In early November of 2013, during the week after the release of Doug’s resignation letter, the five men who confronted Doug at his home revealed the details about the depth and deception of Doug’s sins to the board of Vision Forum Ministries. The Vision Forum board acted swiftly, deciding to close the entire ministry and giving the Phillips family 60 days to vacate their home, which Vision Forum owned. And, on November 11, the closing of Vision Forum Ministries was announced by the board. (Note: The board members of Vision Forum Ministries have been painted in a very poor light by a number of blogs. But, in reality, they acted very quickly and appropriately once they had received the truth. The same suspicion and speculation from a number of blogs also put in a poor light those men who confronted Doug Phillips privately and directly but to no avail.)

A week following the October 29th confrontation at the Phillips’ home, Victim had Doug and Beall Phillips served with a Cease and Desist letter in order to stop them from defaming her. This Cease and Desist letter gives evidence that there was no demonstration of true repentance from Doug Phillips. And, sadly, even his wife Beall was saying unspeakable things about the Victim to members of the community.

Also in November of 2013, Elder Bob Sarratt and Provisional Elder Jeff Horn publicly rebuked Doug Phillips in front of the BCA congregation for his adultery and his deception.  


Some Key Response Pieces

On November 2, 2013, came the first news of anyone publicly saying they knew that Doug Phillips had stepped down as an elder at BCA. This was from Doug’s friend, Voddie Baucham — and it was published about eight months after the fact of Doug’s resignation as BCA elder.

On November 10, Scott Brown, a long-time friend of the Phillips, preached a sermon entitled, “The Smell of Apostasy.” This led people to believe Brown was preaching about the Phillips’ scandal.

On November 13, pastor and patriarchy proponent Doug Wilson mentioned the Phillips scandal in his blog post. He put the blame on the Victim, characterized her as a Delilah, and compared her to a stripper.

On November 14, Doug Phillips posted a follow-up to his original statement of “repentance,” a Clarification on Resignation. He issued this second follow-up statement because the Vision Forum Ministries board believed his first statement was misleading and deceptive. The first letter made it look like this was just an emotional affair, when in fact, Doug confessed to his board and church to a “long-term inappropriate relationship.”


2014: Recent Actions and Concluding Thoughts

On January 1, 2014, the remaining BCA elders responded to the implorings received from several godly men for them to release a statement quickly about former BCA elder Doug Phillips. The result was a pitiful statement released by the elders of BCA.

On March 13, Doug Phillips’ attorney sent a letter to three former Vision Forum associates — Bob Renaud, Jordan Muela, and Peter Bradrick — threatening a lawsuit. According to a recent article in World magazine, that letter states, “The three of you have conspired together, and with others, in an attempt to destroy Doug Phillips, his family and Vision Forum Inc.”


Final Thoughts

This is an account of the double life of Douglas Winston Phillips, as has been exposed to date. This is not the story of a simple “emotional affair” as he had portrayed it. In fact, Doug Phillips apparently continues to refuse using the biblical definition for this illicit affair — adultery — but that is what his church elders called it, and that is what it should be called. Also, Sources note that since the BCA elders rebuked Doug publicly in November of 2013, he has allegedly been slandering the various men who stood up against him. And now his letter to three men indicates potential legal action to protect his reputation and resources. Are these the humble actions of a repentant man, as Doug Phillips himself would have people believe?

The Victim was groomed to play the role she did. Although she was apparently over the age of majority when Doug Phillips began drawing her into his orbit, the fact that he was in a clergy role of authority over her still brings in legal implications of clergy sexual abuse according to definitions in Texas state law, as noted in an earlier post. Regardless of grooming and activity, she was still his Victim. Since choosing to tell her account of the facts, which she began doing in August of 2013, she has continued moving toward healing and health as a Survivor of spiritual and sexual abuse by Doug Phillips.


169 comments on “Attempting to Set the Doug Phillips Record Straight: Part 3 – The Timeline

  1. Pingback: What the Apostle Peter says about Doug Phillips the false teacher and false prophet | A Cry For Justice

  2. Pingback: What the Apostle Peter says about Doug Phillips the false teacher and false prophet

  3. This is very well done. How are the Phillip’s children doing? I can’t imagine what they are going through, realizing that their dad is a hypocrite.


  4. Paul,

    I haven’t heard how the Phillips children are doing. I have noticed that Beall Phillips has opened her Facebook page to the public and is posting cute family pictures – – this is recent – most likely an attempt to paint a public image. What else is new?


  5. “I have noticed that Beall Phillips has opened her Facebook page to the public and is posting cute family pictures – – this is recent – most likely an attempt to paint a public image.”

    That is very disturbing. I have tried to give Beall the benefit of the doubt in all this, but using her family photos to solicit sympathy is a bit low.


  6. Thank you for the reply. I will be praying for those kids.

    One other thing. In your research, have you found out why guys like Voddie, Scott Brown and Kevin Swanson have not spoken up about this? They ran in his circles and were friends with him. Did they not see these tendencies? If not, they know now, but they have remained mostly silent. Kevin mentioned it in one of his shows, but didn’t really say much. These guys are quick to pounce on other false teachers and such, but when it comes from within their circles they don’t seem to say much. Don’t get me wrong, I like Voddie and a lot of what those guys say, but they have to say something, no? Thoughts?


  7. Paul, I think they are having a hard time knowing what to say. All of those guys defend patriarchy in their actions. Kevin Swanson fully endorses it, yet just recently came out with an article saying he’s against it. They are squirming and back peddling big time.

    What some of them are doing is trying to keep the focus on the actual sin/abuse in order to distance that aspect from Patriarchy.

    They really need to be quiet because some of them are digging bigger holes for themselves and they are being watched like hawks now.


  8. Patriarchy IS BIBLICAL.. Both in the NT & OT.. Now that being said it was only in the christian era that women found the ability to have protection and rights to being treated with love and to be given respect.

    I don’t know anything about this issue within this one church other than what I read above in the article.
    However this isn’t an issue of patriarchy.. so much of a man of “power” using God’s name to validate his own human sexual desires which GOD says are sin if used outside of marriage. He had a wife.. He should have fulfilled his needs within that forum!

    As far as that goes.. He has dishonored God and his role as a leader in any church.. EVER!


  9. “Patriarchy IS BIBLICAL.. Both in the NT & OT.. Now that being said it was only in the christian era that women found the ability to have protection and rights to being treated with love and to be given respect. ”

    Tonia, Can you explain what you mean by “Biblical”. Do you mean that it was God’s intention or that it is simply in scripture as a result of separation from God.

    “However this isn’t an issue of patriarchy.. so much of a man of “power” using God’s name to validate his own human sexual desires which GOD says are sin if used outside of marriage. He had a wife.. He should have fulfilled his needs within that forum!”

    What you describe IS patriarchy right after you said it was not an issue of patriarchy. Patriarchy is about power. Male rule. Adult Believers follow Christ. Not mere humans for being male.


  10. “Do I sense some bitterness toward Doug Wilson?”

    That is an interesting choice of descriptor: Bitterness?

    That would be a strange emotion to have for a man who has promoted marriage and children for a pedophile to a judge, written a pro slavery book and describes “biblical” sex in marriage as a war metaphor.

    Disgust would be a better descripter.


  11. Amen. And there is a lot of stuff in the Bible (aka “biblical”) that is NOT CHRISTIAN!!!

    Child sacrifice, stealing your brother’s birthright and becoming the patriarch as a result, having a woman’s husband killed in battle and taking her as your wife, talking donkey, chattel slavery, killing the prophets (preachers), drowning a herd of pigs, etc., etc. Patriarchy is in the OT, but not really in the NT unless one twists and misinterprets the text from the Greek, ignoring the society of the day. Patriarchy is biblical (in the bible) but not Christian. Pharisees are in the NT and are not Christian, but we have a lot of them in the pulpits of Christian churches today!


  12. An Attorney is surely correct to say that patriarchy is not really in the NT. Acts 2:29 refers back to the OT patriarch David. Heb. 7:4 refers back to the OT patriarch Abraham. There is also a reference to the OT patriarchs in Acts 7:8-9. That’s it, at least so far as I can find in the ESV.

    Only one NT passage that I can think of addresses anything touching on patriarchy. Jesus said, “And call no man your father on earth, for you have one Father, who is in heaven.” (Matthew 23:9 ESV). If we are not to call any man our father on earth, how dare we defer to any man as a ruling father, which is what patriarch means (from the Gk. patēr, father + archōn, ruler).

    Personally, I deem patriarchy to belong to the same Biblical categories as adultery, incest, bestiality, rape and slavery. Oh, but I am forgetting. A surprising number of the advocates of patriarchy also defend the practice of slavery.


  13. Pingback: Manly Friendships – Part 2: Odds and Ends (TBB) « Scarlet Letters

  14. I have been following this horrorshow and this blog for a while now. I felt most posts on this case were a little biased but informative and felt no need to respond. *full disclaimer* I am a patriarchist and make no bones about it. This is a VERY fair and unbiased account of the case. Sad but true. Good job to those who worked on it. Pray for all involved. The b******s need it as much as the victim… Probably more.


  15. These people are obviously not Christians. I’m not judging but just because they go to church and have biblical sounding businesses means nothing. It just works for them. ajc

    Liked by 1 person

  16. Disturbing to read, absolutely disgusting behavior on Wilson’s part. However, “Victim” infers that she was a teenager. This all happened when she was in her 20’s. The bedroom window debacle? She was 27 years old. She participated in adultery and was an adult. Set the record straight.


  17. Jill (whose gmail address shows a man’s name),

    You are full of it. The link you posted (and I deleted), links to an men’s rights blog where women are treated as objects. I don’t care of Lourdes initiated any sexual encounter, Texas law says it is illegal for a pastor to have sex with a congregant. Your victim blaming is not welcome here.


Thanks for participating in the SSB community. Please be sure to leave a name/pseudonym (not "Anonymous"). Thx :)

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s